How the book, ‘Skin in the Game’ changed how I understood risk and success
“You need to eat what you feed others.” — Nassim Nicholas Taleb
I often wondered why I found it hard to take certain kinds of people seriously.
But I couldn’t grasp it until I read Nassim Taleb’s Skin in the Game.
Many talk about risk but never take any themselves. They sell frameworks for success but never built anything of their own.
We see university professors talk about business or economics who never built a business themselves.
The book reinforces the idea that real credibility comes from those who have put themselves on the line.
Here are ten of the biggest ideas from the book that will challenge how you see risk, fairness, decision-making, and success:
1. Without skin in the game, there’s no real accountability.
Taleb argues that people who make decisions should bear the consequences.
When they don’t, they make reckless choices without caring about the damage they cause. This applies to politicians, economists, corporate executives, and even self-proclaimed thought leaders.
If someone tells you to take a risk but faces no consequences if you fail, their advice is cheap.
Those worth listening to are the ones who have something to lose if they’re wrong.
A hedge fund manager who invests his own money is accountable for his choices. A government policymaker making economic decisions, on the other hand, faces no personal consequences if those policies fail.
The lack of skin in the game is why bad ideas continue to thrive in environments where the decision-makers never feel the pain of their failures.
2. Asymmetry: Some take risks, and others pay the price.
Modern systems are filled with people who benefit from risky decisions but push the downside onto others.
Bankers take reckless financial risks, but when things go wrong, they get bailed out while the general public suffers the economic consequences.
Executives make poor business decisions but still walk away with golden parachutes.
True fairness requires symmetry. The person making the decision should bear the risks and rewards equally.
Without this balance, bad actors are incentivised to make short-term, high-risk moves that hurt everyone except themselves.
This concept should be applied to everyday decision-making.
Before taking someone’s advice or following a leader blindly, ask: do they bear the consequences of their own decisions? If not, be sceptical.
3. The Minority Rule: A small, stubborn group shapes society.
A committed minority can dictate how the majority behaves.
This happens because the majority tends to be more flexible, while a strong-willed minority refuses to bend. Over time, systems and norms shift to accommodate the minority, not because they represent most people, but because they are unwilling to compromise.
You see this in food regulations. Many food products are now halal or kosher, not because most consumers demand it, but because those who do will only buy products that fit their needs, while the majority will buy anything. Over time, manufacturers adjust to the stricter requirements to avoid losing that segment of the market.
The lesson here is that influence isn’t always about numbers.
A small but firm group with a clear stance can shape entire industries, cultures, and policies.
4. Experts without skin in the game are dangerous.
One of Taleb’s most brutal criticisms is aimed at ‘intellectuals yet idiots’ (IYIs) . These are academics, journalists, and policymakers who make broad claims about how the world works but have no real-world exposure to their own ideas.
They give diet advice based on assumptions without testing it themselves. They create economic models but have never run a business.
The problem is the lack of real-world consequences.
The best experts are those who have tested their ideas in reality.
If someone claims to know the best way to invest, they should be able to show their personal results.
If they can’t, their advice is speculation, not wisdom.
Think about this whenever considering creating something new or sharing your advice.
Stick to the things you know based on personal experience.
5. True entrepreneurs have the ultimate skin in the game.
This is why I’m so proud to focus most of my help towards supporting entrepreneurs and independent creators.
They take on real risk. They invest their own money, time, and energy into their ideas. If they fail, they feel it directly.
Contrast this with corporate managers or consultants who get paid no matter what happens. If they give bad advice, they still collect their fees. But entrepreneurs have no safety net. Their lessons come from direct experience, not from detached theory.
This is why entrepreneurial experience is often more valuable than credentials.
Someone who has successfully built a business, even a small one, knows more about real-world success than someone who only studied it.
6. Freedom is about having skin in the game.
Most people claim to want freedom, but in truth, they’re really after security.
Taleb argues that true freedom comes from having control over your risks.
Salaried workers might feel safe with a steady paycheck, but they depend on their employer.
On the other hand, an independent entrepreneur experiences more financial ups and downs but has real autonomy. They answer to no one.
The more control you have over your own risks, the freer you are.
7. Ethics and honour exist because of skin in the game.
Historically, reputation and honour acted as forms of accountability.
If you broke trust, you suffered real consequences — loss of social standing, exile, or even death.
Modern society has diluted these consequences. Politicians, CEOs, and institutions can lie, make bad decisions, and deceive people without facing real repercussions. This weakens trust at every level.
A strong society requires people to pay the price for their dishonesty. When people face personal consequences for their actions, they are more likely to act ethically.
8. Decentralisation is more effective than centralised control.
Taleb makes the case that small, decentralised systems are more effective and resilient than large, centralised ones.
Governments, large corporations, and global institutions tend to become inefficient because the decision-makers are far removed from the consequences of their choices. They’re out of touch with reality.
This is why big governments tend to be such a cluster F.
In contrast, local governance and small businesses tend to be more accountable and responsive.
A small-town restaurant owner knows that lousy service will directly affect their business. A corporate executive running a chain of restaurants doesn’t feel that impact as directly.
Decentralised systems work better because they maintain skin in the game at every level.
9. Skin in the game leads to better decision-making.
The best decisions come from people who have something to lose if they’re wrong.
Pilots who fly their own planes are more careful than bureaucrats regulating aviation.
Doctors who operate on patients with their own hands are more invested in outcomes than hospital administrators making policies from an office.
When someone has skin in the game, they think more carefully and make better choices.
When evaluating any decision or advice, ask whether the person making it has anything to lose.
10. Real wisdom comes from experience, not just theory.
Taleb rejects the idea that wisdom comes from credentials, degrees, or theoretical knowledge.
Instead, he argues that real wisdom comes from surviving real-world risks.
The people worth listening to are those who have actually done what they talk about — those who have built, lost, failed, adjusted, and succeeded.
Real expertise is earned through exposure, not just through study.
…
Skin in the Game is a book that forces you to rethink who you trust, what risks you take, and how to evaluate advice.
The core idea is simple but powerful: only listen to those with skin in the game.
Before taking action based on someone’s words, ask yourself: if they’re wrong, do they pay a price? If not, their advice is likely to be worthless.
Taleb’s ideas apply to business, politics, investing, personal development, and everyday life.
The more you think about them, the more you’ll start spotting unfair asymmetry everywhere.
If you’d like my support in reducing overthinking by 90% so you can make better decisions, you’ll love my course, Untethered Mind.
Learn more about the course here.
If you'd like to support me and gain access to hundreds of locked articles like this one, you'll want to become a paying subscriber here on Substack for less than the price of a couple of large coffees each month: